Thursday, 11 April 2013

Girl Interrupted

By: Katie Macisaac 


           Authors Vannini and Fornssler’s, Girl, Interrupted: Interpreting Semenya’s Body, Gender Verification Testing and Public Discourse, explore how sex-gender is contained in mediated public discourses that questioned caster Semenya’s identity at the International Association of Athletic Federation World Championship. They exam Semnya’s sex and gender identity by using discussions, scientific and medical methods, and athletic governance policies of her “disordered” body. Furthermore, where her competing with women is considered “fair-play” and “equal” for other female athletes, or whether they should consider a new class of competition.
            As stated throughout the article, Semenya has three times more testosterone than the average woman. In addition, testosterone is the hormone, which allows men to be physically more competitive and able than women. Furthermore, in drug testing it is the increase in testosterone which is detected to conclude whether athletes are indeed taking performance enhancing drugs. After Semenya won the 800m at the IAAF back in 2009, her time was almost near impossible 1’55”45 whopping the nearest competitor by 2”45.[1] It was the drug test that detected the increase in testosterone and she was accused of taking performance enhancing drugs but all drug test came clear. The next test would be sex and gender testing, this would conclude that she had the secondary sex anatomy of females but lacked the primary (uterus and ovaries).
            Methods of sex and gender verification are visually based inspections of athletes, because Semenya appears more masculine she is automatically judged for appearance rather than athletic ability, furthermore, her athletic ability is no longer an element to be amazed by but to be judged by. Due to Semenya’s special case, an introduction of a third category further supports “pure” male and female. However, Semenya declares herself to be a woman and has always thought of herself as one. When she entered the competition of course she entered as a female, she did not know of her increase testosterone level, she did not have any knowledge that this would give her an advantage in competition. In the media, people deemed Semenya a man due to her “body is outcast from the female sex category because her bodily shape and muscles distribution defies the disciplinary regime of a feminized body, similarly to women bodybuilders whose bodies challenge what is considered natural for women’s bodies.” [2] However, the argument that is being presentment is that
If Semenya defines herself as a woman that’s fine with me. In the case with transgendered people there may not be the ability to definitively categorize them as one or the other. But in the case of athletic competition if testosterone is the ‘male advantage’ and you have an organ that produces it naturally then that’s the category you should race in.[3]

In the blog the argument that is being fought is that even though Semenya does lack the sexual organs of being a woman, she considers herself a woman and always have.


[1] Fornssler & Vannini. 244.
[2] Fornssler & Vannini. 249.
[3] Ibid. 252.

No comments:

Post a Comment